When purchasing a villa in Thailand, developers may offer two different legal structures:
a sale and purchase agreement or a construction contract.
In practice, these are fundamentally different approaches, even though in both cases the land is typically transferred to a foreigner under a leasehold agreement.
What Is the Difference Between the Models?
Purchase of a Completed House
The developer:
- completes construction
- commissions the property
- obtains a house registration book
After that:
- a sale and purchase agreement is signed
- ownership is registered with the Land Department
- taxes and fees are paid (on average around 6.3%)
As a result, the buyer has:
- the main document — the sale and purchase agreement
- ownership rights arising after registration
Construction of a House
The developer acts as a contractor and builds the property for the client.
Key features:
- the client becomes the owner of the building
- ownership arises based on the construction permit
- registration with the Land Department is not required
- no transfer taxes apply
Key Differences
VAT
Purchase:
- real estate sales are not subject to VAT
Construction:
- contractor services are subject to 7% VAT
- if VAT is not included in the contract, it increases the project budget
Ownership Rights
Purchase:
- ownership arises only after registration
- until then, the buyer does not control the property
Construction:
- the client becomes the owner during construction
- from the moment the construction permit is issued
This means:
- all risks are transferred to the client at an early stage
Source of Funds
Purchase:
- requires proof of funds transferred from abroad (TT3 form)
- especially relevant in Phuket
Construction:
- no such requirement
- you can use:
- funds already in Thailand
- reinvested money
Title Documents
Purchase:
- sale and purchase agreement
Construction:
- construction permit
Important to consider:
- obtaining a construction permit in the name of a foreigner may be complicated
In practice:
- the permit is often issued in the developer’s name
- then reassigned to the client
These conditions should be clearly defined in the contract in advance.
Conclusion
Purchase and construction are two different legal and financial models.
Purchase:
- simpler in structure
- clear documentation
- but requires payment of taxes upon registration
Construction:
- offers more flexibility
- may be more tax-efficient
- but transfers more risks to the client
The choice depends on:
- the investor’s goals
- the transaction structure
- willingness to manage risks
Author: Alexandra Agapitova.
All rights reserved.
Copying and use of materials without written permission of the owner is prohibited.