House Purchase Agreement vs Construction Contract

When purchasing a villa in Thailand, developers may offer two different legal structures:
a sale and purchase agreement or a construction contract.

In practice, these are fundamentally different approaches, even though in both cases the land is typically transferred to a foreigner under a leasehold agreement.

What Is the Difference Between the Models?

Purchase of a Completed House

The developer:

  • completes construction
  • commissions the property
  • obtains a house registration book

After that:

  • a sale and purchase agreement is signed
  • ownership is registered with the Land Department
  • taxes and fees are paid (on average around 6.3%)

As a result, the buyer has:

  • the main document — the sale and purchase agreement
  • ownership rights arising after registration

Construction of a House

The developer acts as a contractor and builds the property for the client.

Key features:

  • the client becomes the owner of the building
  • ownership arises based on the construction permit
  • registration with the Land Department is not required
  • no transfer taxes apply

Key Differences

VAT

Purchase:

  • real estate sales are not subject to VAT

Construction:

  • contractor services are subject to 7% VAT
  • if VAT is not included in the contract, it increases the project budget

Ownership Rights

Purchase:

  • ownership arises only after registration
  • until then, the buyer does not control the property

Construction:

  • the client becomes the owner during construction
  • from the moment the construction permit is issued

This means:

  • all risks are transferred to the client at an early stage

Source of Funds

Purchase:

  • requires proof of funds transferred from abroad (TT3 form)
  • especially relevant in Phuket

Construction:

  • no such requirement
  • you can use:
    • funds already in Thailand
    • reinvested money

Title Documents

Purchase:

  • sale and purchase agreement

Construction:

  • construction permit

Important to consider:

  • obtaining a construction permit in the name of a foreigner may be complicated

In practice:

  • the permit is often issued in the developer’s name
  • then reassigned to the client

These conditions should be clearly defined in the contract in advance.

Conclusion

Purchase and construction are two different legal and financial models.

Purchase:

  • simpler in structure
  • clear documentation
  • but requires payment of taxes upon registration

Construction:

  • offers more flexibility
  • may be more tax-efficient
  • but transfers more risks to the client

The choice depends on:

  • the investor’s goals
  • the transaction structure
  • willingness to manage risks

Author: Alexandra Agapitova.
All rights reserved.
Copying and use of materials without written permission of the owner is prohibited.

Scroll to Top